Epiphany Acoustics Evolution Audio  Audio Emotion 
Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    Registered
    Join Date
     Aug 2008
    Posts
     1
    Location
     , ,

    Post imported post

    Hi Guys, I have a shortlist of 3 players, cambridge audio azur 540,nad 515bee and marantz 5001.
    Most reviews i have read are about sound quality which is important but equally important to me is reliability and the ability to read copied discs.So any ideas which to choose? Please help I'm really stuck?

    Thanks in advance




  2. #2
    Founding Wammer
    Join Date
     Aug 2005
    Posts
     4,651
    Location
     Black Country
    Turn Table
     Project Debut Carbon
    T/Arm & Cart
     Ortofon 2M Red
    SUT/Phono
     Project MM
    Digital Source 1
     My amp
    Integrated Amp
     Arcam AVR600
    Speakers
     PMC DB1i
    In the Hi-Fi industry?
     No

    Post imported post

    Hi, welcome to the forum

    I've moved this to the 2-channel debate section as you are more likely to get a response here.
    What does it all mean Basil ???

  3. #3
    Wammer
    Join Date
     Sep 2005
    Posts
     251
    Location
     , , United Kingdom

    Post imported post

    All of these players will happily read cd-r and cd-rw discs, the NAD will play back MP3 files if that's a feature you need.

    NAD have a decent reputation for reliability and I would think that the Marantz and Cambridge would be pretty good too. If you really want peace-of-mind, Richer Sounds will extend the warranty to 5 years for an extra 10% of the purchase price and will even refund the 10% at the end of the five years if you don't claim.

  4. #4
    Pfft Injector's Avatar
    Join Date
     Jul 2005
    Posts
     14,174
    Location
     In a shed
    In the Hi-Fi industry?
     No

    Post imported post

    I'd go for the Cambridge or the NAD (the latter being my own preference). Modern budget Marantz equipment can have a bit of a short lifespan. All new machines will play cdr/rw these days.
    I don't like stuff that sucks.

  5. #5
    Wammer
    Join Date
     Dec 2006
    Posts
     182
    Location
     , ,

    Post imported post

    There should be no substitute for listening to your shortlist of items in your system in your room.

    Whichever sounds best to your ears is what you should go with - surely?

    As for reliability - you automatically get twelve months (on new equipment) by law - even those with enviable reputations can produce a rogue unit, so checking out aftersales may be a wise route for you?

  6. #6
    Wammer
    Join Date
     Jul 2008
    Posts
     400
    Location
     Piddletrenthide, ,

    Post imported post

    I was looking at the nad c515 a few weeks ago as a match for my nad amp. There were two "consumer" reviews on the nad website and they were both critical of the build quality and reliability.

    Funnily enough these have now been removed and replaced with glowing what hifi reviews. curious !

    I'd go for the cambridge audio and richers supercare which ireally is a no brainer
    .... Yes sir, I can boogie, boogie woogie, all night long ....

  7. #7
    Wammer
    Join Date
     Jul 2005
    Posts
     11,775
    Location
     , ,

    Post imported post

    knobby1 wrote:
    Hi Guys, I have a shortlist of 3 players, cambridge audio azur 540,nad 515bee and marantz 5001.
    Most reviews i have read are about sound quality which is important but equally important to me is reliability and the ability to read copied discs.So any ideas which to choose? Please help I'm really stuck?

    Thanks in advance


    rather than them (dont know there price) how about a Naim CD5i ?

  8. #8
    Wammer antonbhoy's Avatar
    Join Date
     Jul 2005
    Posts
     377
    Location
     Glasgow, , United Ki
    Real Name
     Anthony
    Turn Table
     No
    Digital Source 1
     Pioneer DV-610
    Integrated Amp
     Onkyo A-5VL
    Speakers
     MA Bronze BR2
    In the Hi-Fi industry?
     No

    Post imported post

    I had the Nad for a while, and sold it as I found it to be a bit on the boring side. Out of the three I prefer the Marantz. I think Richers still offer the 30 day money back guarantee, so try them and if you don't like take em back. (check first though).

  9. #9
    Super Wammer JANDL100's Avatar
    Join Date
     Dec 2006
    Posts
     12,192
    Location
     Forest of Dean, Glos
    Real Name
     Jerry
    Turn Table
     Technics SL150ii
    T/Arm & Cart
     AT1010 / Orty MC25FL
    SUT/Phono
     Marantz 4230
    Digital Source 1
     Pioneer DVD CDT
    Digital Source 2
     Arcam DV29 DVDP
    DAC
     Wyred4Sound DAC1
    Integrated Amp
     NAD S300
    Speakers
     MBL 116F
    In the Hi-Fi industry?
     No

    Post imported post

    Welcome to the Wigwam, knobby.

    It's traditional around here to decide on the budget and then spend at least 30% or so more ... so, go on, git yourself a Cambridge 840 cdp- you know it makes sense!

    See Earl's Wigwam reviewHERE
    Life's too short for boring hifi!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •