Audio Emotion Purite North  Epiphany Acoustics 
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 25

Thread: CD v Vinyl

  1. #1
    Founding Member ClassikFan's Avatar
    Join Date
     Jul 2005
    Posts
     4,607
    Location
     Surrey
    Real Name
     Stuart
    Turn Table
     Michell Gyro SE
    Digital Source 1
     Yamaha CD-S2000
    Integrated Amp
     Plinius Pre/Power
    Speakers
     ProAc
    In the Hi-Fi industry?
     No

    Post imported post

    Who has got both a top class TT and CD player?

    What are the main differences, if any?

    Personally, I much prefer vinyl on my Gyro over Cd on my Classik, but would it be a closer call if I had an equivalent priced CD spinner ie. about £2000.

    Lets hear peoples experiences.
    Just coz you got the power... that don't mean you got the right.

  2. #2
    Effem
    Guest

    Post imported post

    I would have said the TT ruled right up until I started fooling around with esoteric transports paired with a decent DAC.

  3. #3
    Founding Wammer chezi61's Avatar
    Join Date
     Jul 2005
    Posts
     2,193
    Location
     Fife , Scotland.
    In the Hi-Fi industry?
     No

    Post imported post

    Same as yourself Classic.

    Sondek wets on arcam with ease.Would love to hear it up against AK's Bow.

    On second thoughts mibee not.

    chezi.

  4. #4
    Founding Member ClassikFan's Avatar
    Join Date
     Jul 2005
    Posts
     4,607
    Location
     Surrey
    Real Name
     Stuart
    Turn Table
     Michell Gyro SE
    Digital Source 1
     Yamaha CD-S2000
    Integrated Amp
     Plinius Pre/Power
    Speakers
     ProAc
    In the Hi-Fi industry?
     No

    Post imported post

    Effem wrote:
    I would have said the TT ruled right up until I started fooling around with esoteric transports paired with a decent DAC.

    What sort of cost would you put on esoteric transports paired with a decent DAC effem?
    Just coz you got the power... that don't mean you got the right.

  5. #5
    Administrator Hawk's Avatar
    Join Date
     Jul 2005
    Posts
     6,356
    Location
     Herts, United Kingdo
    In the Hi-Fi industry?
     No

    Post imported post

    Good question, I have a CDS3 (7K ish) and a modest spec LP12(Ittock/17D2) and id say there are times when the LP12 sounds better and times when the CDS3 kicks its arse!
    The CDS3 i guess by nature is alot more consistent, but get a nice heavy slab of well recorded clean vinyl on the LP12 and it manages to humble the CDP. If you can live with the downsides of vinyl then £ for £ it wins by a healthy margin, IMO... but a good high end CDP or Transport/DAC can still show a clean pair of heels to a mid priced TT but obviously it will be more expensive...

    Hawk

  6. #6
    adam
    Guest

    Post imported post

    I think vinyl has better imaging,more front and back depth to the sound,reaches out of the box more,has a more fluent treble which is smoother,bass times better.That's a modded Rega P25 waiting for new DV17 cart.

    Whereas my tubed CDcplayer/DAC offers more detail,greater clarity,I enjoy both equally but they sound different.

  7. #7
    Admin hifiwigwam's Avatar
    Join Date
     Jul 2005
    Posts
     27,237
    Location
     Sussex, West Side.
    Real Name
     James
    Turn Table
     Acoustic Solid 111
    T/Arm & Cart
     Audio Note / Benz
    SUT/Phono
     Puresound T10/P10
    Digital Source 1
     Leema - Antilla
    Digital Source 2
     SONOS connect
    DAC
     Leema Elements
    Speakers
     Living Voice OBX R2
    Pre Amp
     Modwright SWL 9.0SE
    Power Amp
     Advantage S100
    Headphones
     Bowers & Wilkins P7
    In the Hi-Fi industry?
     No

    Post imported post

    AK and Whitter should be in on this thread as they both have serious Digital and analogue sources.. come on guys what is better for you.

  8. #8
    Guest

    Post imported post

    Me the CDP kicks the TT's arse, but that has a lot to do with my TT, although good, doesn't even come close TBH, compared my CDP with snappers LP12 in his system, and TBH not a lot in it, would then come down to taste and disc.



    Lets just say they are both good, and like a lot of things in this industry the more you spend....the better, but again the law of real diminishing returns kicks in around the price of the Bow and top LP12 stuff, after that it's very subtle differences and a lot of the time is more down to taste, than anyone being better.



    Oh and the Bow and LP12 are both better than the cds3 ;)

  9. #9
    Guest

    Post imported post

    Just read Adam's post, gotta disagree with you regarding soundstage, but I guess in your case the TT is outclassing the cd player, I reckon if you pick one from each at similar budgets, then there isn't much in it, my CD sounds pretty smooth and analoguey, ie more liquid, no harshness, and goes just as deep, in the bass (in fact deeper than my current TT)

  10. #10
    Administrator Hawk's Avatar
    Join Date
     Jul 2005
    Posts
     6,356
    Location
     Herts, United Kingdo
    In the Hi-Fi industry?
     No

    Post imported post

    analoguekid wrote:
    *

    Oh and the Bow and LP12 are both better than the cds3 ;)
    Then 'he who should not be naimed' woke up from his dream.. ;)

  11. #11
    Guest

    Post imported post

    and what was it you were dreaming about?, or was that you coming out a brainwashing session

  12. #12
    Administrator Hawk's Avatar
    Join Date
     Jul 2005
    Posts
     6,356
    Location
     Herts, United Kingdo
    In the Hi-Fi industry?
     No

    Post imported post

    Im wide awake thanks ;)

  13. #13
    adam
    Guest

    Post imported post

    Paul,I think the Transport/DAC outclasses the TT,it's just I feel,not so much in the soundstages width,but in depth,front to back vinyl is better than what I find a more flatter,but more detailed CD.

  14. #14
    Effem
    Guest

    Post imported post

    ClassikFan wrote:
    Effem wrote:
    I would have said the TT ruled right up until I started fooling around with esoteric transports paired with a decent DAC.
    What sort of cost would you put on esoteric transports paired with a decent DAC effem?
    Cor, that's a loaded question Stuart :Not Sure:

    My transport cost £8,000 brand new but of courseI paid nowhere near that. Doubt very much indeed if I could have afforded it's new price tag.

    The DAC is a knotty one to answer because I've been through a whole long series of 24/96 DAC's costing up to £1k and have been impressed by none of them at all, having a harshness that's very hard to put your finger on and as for front to back imaging depth that a good TT can give you, then forget it. I found much better results in the older 20 bit DAC's such as PS Audio, Wadia 12 and especially so from my current Monarchy Audio M-22 DAC which has a smooth sublime 'analogue like' sound coupled with immense imaging depth and placement.



  15. #15
    Super Wammer
    Join Date
     Aug 2005
    Posts
     1,514
    Location
     London
    In the Hi-Fi industry?
     No

    Post imported post

    analoguekid wrote:
    Me the CDP kicks the TT's arse, but that has a lot to do with my TT, although good, doesn't even come close TBH, compared my CDP with snappers LP12 in his system, and TBH not a lot in it, would then come down to taste and disc.



    Lets just say they are both good, and like a lot of things in this industry the more you spend....the better, but again the law of real diminishing returns kicks in around the price of the Bow and top LP12 stuff, after that it's very subtle differences and a lot of the time is more down to taste, than anyone being better.



    Oh and the Bow and LP12 are both better than the cds3 ;)

    Last bit is a bit off. Different yes vs the turntable. the '3 is more musical than the Bow.



  16. #16
    Guest

    Post imported post

    Picard wrote:
    analoguekid wrote:
    Me the CDP kicks the TT's arse, but that has a lot to do with my TT, although good, doesn't even come close TBH, compared my CDP with snappers LP12 in his system, and TBH not a lot in it, would then come down to taste and disc.



    Lets just say they are both good, and like a lot of things in this industry the more you spend....the better, but again the law of real diminishing returns kicks in around the price of the Bow and top LP12 stuff, after that it's very subtle differences and a lot of the time is more down to taste, than anyone being better.



    Oh and the Bow and LP12 are both better than the cds3 ;)

    Last bit is a bit off. Different yes vs the turntable. the '3 is more musical than the Bow.

    guess thats what they mean by subjective, funnily enough, for a room where 2/3rds were vinyl junkies, we only played one side of a record!!

    I think the cds is a bit recessed in the mid and a tad flat, spose we are all different.

  17. #17
    Administrator Hawk's Avatar
    Join Date
     Jul 2005
    Posts
     6,356
    Location
     Herts, United Kingdo
    In the Hi-Fi industry?
     No

    Post imported post

    analoguekid wrote:
    Picard wrote:
    analoguekid wrote:
    Me the CDP kicks the TT's arse, but that has a lot to do with my TT, although good, doesn't even come close TBH, compared my CDP with snappers LP12 in his system, and TBH not a lot in it, would then come down to taste and disc.

    *

    Lets just say they are both good, and like a lot of things in this industry the more you spend....the better, but again the law of real diminishing returns kicks in around the price of the Bow and top LP12 stuff, after that it's very subtle differences and a lot of the time is more down to taste, than anyone being better.

    *

    Oh and the Bow and LP12 are both better than the cds3 ;)
    *

    Last bit is a bit off. Different yes vs the turntable. the '3 is more musical than the Bow.

    *
    *guess thats what they mean by subjective, funnily enough, for a room where 2/3rds were vinyl junkies, we only played one side of a record!!

    I think the cds is a bit recessed in the mid and a tad flat, spose we are all different.
    lol, that will have been the cotton wool in your ears that caused that

    We all know how much you love to hate Naim, but joking apart how different is the Wizard 2 to the original? If its moved on then i might give it a good listening to..

    Hawk

  18. #18
    Guest

    Post imported post

    haven't heard the original one so won't know the answer.

  19. #19
    Administrator Hawk's Avatar
    Join Date
     Jul 2005
    Posts
     6,356
    Location
     Herts, United Kingdo
    In the Hi-Fi industry?
     No

    Post imported post

    analoguekid wrote:
    haven't heard the original one so won't know the answer.
    Does anyone know the answer? genuine question...

    Hawk

  20. #20
    Super Wammer
    Join Date
     Aug 2005
    Posts
     1,514
    Location
     London
    In the Hi-Fi industry?
     No

    Post imported post

    Hawk wrote:
    analoguekid wrote:
    haven't heard the original one so won't know the answer.
    Does anyone know the answer? genuine question...

    Hawk

    Yes. There's not a lot of difference. There IS a difference of course, bit more detail, air, resolution. Some will hear more of a difference than others. Bow, of course, will claim there's a huge difference between the players.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •