ClassikFan wrote:HiFi World Subsription now cancelled.
![]()
ClassikFan wrote:HiFi World Subsription now cancelled.
![]()
It doesn't matter if the glass is half full or half empty. Either way, there's room for more beer in it.
I dug-up this thread, searching for advice on 4x4s.
How the f8ck do LandRover do it? How can you make a Discovery and not have height adjustable seats? And how do you make such a big vehicle, with such a small amount of space inside?
The Freelander was worse, I'm too tall to drive one. I'm only 5' 11" and my eyeline is level with the top of the windscreen.
I think I'll stick with my original choice(s), SWB Patrol, Landcruiser or Trooper.
I, I follow, I follow you, deep sea baby...
Beobloke wrote:Jezzer wrote:Sat in front of me in the traffic this morning was a 56 plate Discovery ...........blah blah blah aren't they rubbish and unreliable.........Well, which one was it then?...but not with a three year old Range Rover.
Normally at this point I would dive in head first to sneer at the Jap-crapthat's been mentioned so far,bang on about how wonderful Land Rovers are and how brilliant the Disco 3 is (when it's working) but as the OP is a caravannist and has five stinking mutts (WHY??!) I wouldn't like to see such a wonderful vehicle subject to such treatment.
Therefore, my advice is - go for an Audi Q7, Porsche Cayenne or BMW X5.
Must admit, if I had 5 mutts I'd be driving them 'round in a £500 banger.
I love the new Discos, much nicer lookers than the current Range Rover (which has been ruined by the sales rep 'Sport' model).
Still,a good 90% ofroad-going 4WDs are huge and unnecessary Tonka trucks - IMO, YMMV etc.
I don't like stuff that sucks.