Head Room  Audio Emotion Temple Audio  The Hifi ShowTemple Audio 
Page 72 of 140 FirstFirst ... 2262707172737482122 ... LastLast
Results 1,421 to 1,440 of 2800
  1. #1421
    Founding Wammer SSM's Avatar
    Join Date
     Jul 2005
    Posts
     17,501
    Location
     Tipoca City
    DAC
     8
    Integrated Amp
     PP-1, SS-5
    Speakers
     12pr
    Pre Amp
     Triode-3, SS-1
    Power Amp
     SE-3, PP-2, SS-2, 1D
    Headphones
     LOL
    In the Hi-Fi industry?
     No
    Oh wow. I await that report with bated breath.

    I myself had been wondering if a SCM7 (or 11) biamped with an Exposure int+pwr combo might be ahead of the (single-wired) S3/5R or SA1 driven with one amp (however classy)...

    I do find the treble on my SCM11 more 'attacking' than the S3/5R. Although lately, with the improvements in the S3/5R's sound brought about by the X-A2, the possiblity has been raised that the SCM's treble may be slightly on the bright side. Check out Stereophile's measurements on the SCM11's and SA1's tweeter response, the difference between these tweeters may be a case of 'enhanced' vs 'natural'.


    SS




    SS
    CONRAD-JOHNSON HD3 & ET3SE > SUN SV-2A3 L.E. 25th Anniv. SE Class A | NAIM DAC V1 > C-J CLASSIC 60SE PP
    PRIMARE DAC30 > AYRE K-5xeMP > 6V6GT SE Class A | audiolab M-DAC
    > ICON AUDIO LA4 MKIII > EL84 SE Class A
    MUSICAL FIDELITY X-T100
    (modded valve pre) > GENESIS Advanced Tech. M60 (& I60) PP | PRIMARE A34.2 Class D
    OMEGA SUPER ALNICO & 3i Monitors |
    PRECISION 6.2, ELAC BS244, ATC SCM11, S3/5R, Alnico, XERO, DM 2/6, Q 2020i
    SS relics: REGA ELICIT, ARCAM A38, Musical Fidelity X-A2, NAIM NAP 100, QUAD 909, SONY TA-F246E | (reserved)

  2. #1422
    Moderator HoopsOnToast's Avatar
    Join Date
     Feb 2006
    Posts
     10,702
    Location
     Faringdon
    Real Name
     Rob
    In the Hi-Fi industry?
     No
    I heard the combo with the Naim Nait 5i/CD5i and i actually think that the spendors sounded better with that combo than the ATC's did. I am not a huge fan of the Naim kit tbh. I would guess that the S3/5R's or SA1's would go well with both MF and Naim kit, where as the 7's/11's would be good with the ATC pre-power and possibly the Quad 99 series (which i might look into in the future)

    Not too sure on the difference between the 7's bi amped and 11 with just one, the 11's do get a lot more air time in the shop and in mags alike, the 7's do seem a little forgotten. i would guess that the 11's would be better value, and can play a little louder / bigger rooms.
    Michell Gyrodec SE / SME M2-9 / AT33PTG / Trichord Dino - Sony DVP-S9000ES - Bryston B60 - Vandersteen 1C
    Other Bits: Decware Zen, Keesonic Kolt, Keesonic 701a

  3. #1423
    In the trade Wammer FrankHarveyHiFi 's Avatar
    Join Date
     Jul 2009
    Posts
     20
    Location
     Coventry, , United Kingdom
    In the Hi-Fi industry?
     Yes
    I did a quick demo test with the SA1's the other day for guy on another forum, but decided to quickly compare the SCM7 to the SA1's seeing as I had the Bryston pre/power and the ATC SIA2-150 set up and ready to go. Given that the SCM7 is half the price of the SA1's, I can't see too many people choosing the SA1's over them. Don't get me wrong, they both performed extremely well, and the SA1's surprised me in that they dealt well with one of my test discs that I really thought they'd sound awful with. I did feel more at ease with the SCM7's due to their longer throw bass driver - you just felt you could turn it up and you wouldn't need to worry - I got the Bryston up to 12 o'clock and they were as happy as a pig in ****. They sounded like a box at least twice the size, and seemed beautifully balanced in our demo room. There's certainly no other speaker at 500/600 that can touch these, and certainly nothing this side of the SCM11.

    Was that what people were looking for or is more detail needed?

    I feel like getting back up stairs and listening to them a little more......
    Frank Harvey Hi-Fi have one of the largest ranges of hi-fi and home cinema in the Midlands. To find out more, visit our website or blog, or contact myself, David.

  4. #1424
    Founding Wammer SSM's Avatar
    Join Date
     Jul 2005
    Posts
     17,501
    Location
     Tipoca City
    DAC
     8
    Integrated Amp
     PP-1, SS-5
    Speakers
     12pr
    Pre Amp
     Triode-3, SS-1
    Power Amp
     SE-3, PP-2, SS-2, 1D
    Headphones
     LOL
    In the Hi-Fi industry?
     No
    Quote Originally Posted by FrankHarveyHiFi View Post
    Don't get me wrong, they both performed extremely well, and the SA1's surprised me in that they dealt well with one of my test discs that I really thought they'd sound awful with. I did feel more at ease with the SCM7's due to their longer throw bass driver - you just felt you could turn it up and you wouldn't need to worry - I got the Bryston up to 12 o'clock and they were as happy as a pig in ****.
    I'll have to agree with that. While these monitors from ATC and Spendor have their own particular sets of strengths, the build of the drivers on my SCM11 inspires more confidence. I have driven them very hard occasionally but they never even gave a hint of cracking. While I haven't driven my S3/5R to meltdown yet either, a certain feeling abides that Spendor's polymer woofers are more delicate than ATC's.

    There is a professional review of the SA1 on an audio site whose author mentioned that he applied too much amp juice on one occasion which caused a puff of smoke to arise from the SA1 woofers. While he did go overboard on the '00s of monoblock watts used, his finding doesn't inspire much confidence in me for ever wanting to punt a full 100W/ch into my (future) SA1s. Drood and Igglebert, take note...


    SS
    CONRAD-JOHNSON HD3 & ET3SE > SUN SV-2A3 L.E. 25th Anniv. SE Class A | NAIM DAC V1 > C-J CLASSIC 60SE PP
    PRIMARE DAC30 > AYRE K-5xeMP > 6V6GT SE Class A | audiolab M-DAC
    > ICON AUDIO LA4 MKIII > EL84 SE Class A
    MUSICAL FIDELITY X-T100
    (modded valve pre) > GENESIS Advanced Tech. M60 (& I60) PP | PRIMARE A34.2 Class D
    OMEGA SUPER ALNICO & 3i Monitors |
    PRECISION 6.2, ELAC BS244, ATC SCM11, S3/5R, Alnico, XERO, DM 2/6, Q 2020i
    SS relics: REGA ELICIT, ARCAM A38, Musical Fidelity X-A2, NAIM NAP 100, QUAD 909, SONY TA-F246E | (reserved)

  5. #1425
    Wammer
    Join Date
     Sep 2008
    Posts
     427
    Location
     Sheffield, UK
    Real Name
     Nigel
    Digital Source 1
     Marantz Pearl Lite
    Digital Source 2
     Sonos Connect
    Integrated Amp
     Marantz Pearl Lite
    Speakers
     KEF LS50
    In the Hi-Fi industry?
     No
    Quote Originally Posted by SSM View Post
    Which begs the question... with ATC around, who needs Ushers? Attachment 794

    One of the side projects I have on the shelf is swapping the Xeros for SCM7. That will give me a triptych of ssuperb ssealed-box ssmall sspeakers. The SCM7's spec measurements in the Jun'07 HFN issue suggests it is one of the most dynamic and high-value-for-money speaker in the 1k bracket, and unrivaled for neutrality even in 2010 (except by the SCM11). Incidentally, it beat an Usher speaker in that supertest (80%>55%)

    I would like to ask Drood how his SA1 compares with the SCM7 dynamically. (I'd only expect a sane reply sometime in Oct, where his SA1 euphoria would have gone flaccid then.)


    SS
    It's a good questiion, and one that's quite easy to answer. The SCM7s have a weightier, "meatier" presentation, and do indeed have more slam and dynamism. One of my finest experiences with them was listening to a pair of Shostakovich symphonies and being awed by the ease with which they handled the crescendoes. They are amazing value for money at under 600, here in England. As you suggest, the SA1s have different strengths - eerie lucidity, great imaging, and great overall refinement, so what bass there is, is of great quality. They are also faster and more articulate than the SCM7s, themselves no slouch in that department. It all comes down to where your priorities lie. Sadly, for my wallet, I found it hard to forget the super lucidity of the SA1s having home demoed them about a year ago, and eventually had to get me a pair.

    As for all this talk of turning the wick up until smoke comes out of the drivers - what are you, animals?! There is no way a delicate SA1 owner would even contemplate abusing his speakers in such a brutal fashion. They go loud enough for me, is all I can say.

    And Solid - why the anti-Naim propaganda all of a sudden. Didn't you have your eye on a Naim amp at one point? Is this just a case of sour grapes :-)

    My SCM7s are for sale on this very forum, by the way

  6. #1426
    Founding Wammer SSM's Avatar
    Join Date
     Jul 2005
    Posts
     17,501
    Location
     Tipoca City
    DAC
     8
    Integrated Amp
     PP-1, SS-5
    Speakers
     12pr
    Pre Amp
     Triode-3, SS-1
    Power Amp
     SE-3, PP-2, SS-2, 1D
    Headphones
     LOL
    In the Hi-Fi industry?
     No
    Good luck with the sale.

    Naim is a fine brand which I hate to love and love to hate. Would prolly be a Nait XS owner now if I didn't find its external psu bait hard to swallow. Oh you needn't worry about barbequeing your SA1 with your Naimies. Naim watts are measly and not full-bandwidth enough to generate distress at either frequency extremes.

    Ta for the notes on the SCM7 vs SA1.


    SS
    CONRAD-JOHNSON HD3 & ET3SE > SUN SV-2A3 L.E. 25th Anniv. SE Class A | NAIM DAC V1 > C-J CLASSIC 60SE PP
    PRIMARE DAC30 > AYRE K-5xeMP > 6V6GT SE Class A | audiolab M-DAC
    > ICON AUDIO LA4 MKIII > EL84 SE Class A
    MUSICAL FIDELITY X-T100
    (modded valve pre) > GENESIS Advanced Tech. M60 (& I60) PP | PRIMARE A34.2 Class D
    OMEGA SUPER ALNICO & 3i Monitors |
    PRECISION 6.2, ELAC BS244, ATC SCM11, S3/5R, Alnico, XERO, DM 2/6, Q 2020i
    SS relics: REGA ELICIT, ARCAM A38, Musical Fidelity X-A2, NAIM NAP 100, QUAD 909, SONY TA-F246E | (reserved)

  7. #1427
    Moderator HoopsOnToast's Avatar
    Join Date
     Feb 2006
    Posts
     10,702
    Location
     Faringdon
    Real Name
     Rob
    In the Hi-Fi industry?
     No
    Quote Originally Posted by droodzilla View Post
    As for all this talk of turning the wick up until smoke comes out of the drivers - what are you, animals?! There is no way a delicate SA1 owner would even contemplate abusing his speakers in such a brutal fashion. They go loud enough for me, is all I can say.
    IMO i listen to a wide variety of music including dance and soundtracks with a lot of low bass notes, i found that the 7's coped a lot better with that than the S3/5R's. Although you have to take in to account that these are small standmounts so wont be head bang speakers, its all relative.
    Michell Gyrodec SE / SME M2-9 / AT33PTG / Trichord Dino - Sony DVP-S9000ES - Bryston B60 - Vandersteen 1C
    Other Bits: Decware Zen, Keesonic Kolt, Keesonic 701a

  8. #1428
    Wammer
    Join Date
     Sep 2008
    Posts
     427
    Location
     Sheffield, UK
    Real Name
     Nigel
    Digital Source 1
     Marantz Pearl Lite
    Digital Source 2
     Sonos Connect
    Integrated Amp
     Marantz Pearl Lite
    Speakers
     KEF LS50
    In the Hi-Fi industry?
     No
    Oh God, what have I done?!

    Well, for starters I bought a pair of secondhand (but BNIB) SA1 stands last week. I've been experimenting with positioning and getting my head round what they do to the sound of the SA1s - a subtle, but interesting, and beneficial effect, I think. Anyway, I was gearing up to document my findings on this hallowed forum when I saw this:

    http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Harbeth-P3ESR-...05c1c7&afsrc=1

    Yes, a pair of the near mythical Harbeth P3ESRs for sale on e-Bay, less than a year old, and in perfect nick, at a very reasonable price. Harbeth speakers rarely surface on the secondhand market, and in my sleep deprived, insomniac state, this proved to be temptation beyond endurance. After about ten minutes agonising, I clicked on "Buy it Now". I was then presented with a screen explaining I was ab out to enter into a legally binding contract, and inviting me to "Commit to this Purchase". Cue, ten minutes of further torment, while my finger hovered over the "Commit" button. In the end I actually closed my eyes, and my finger somehow slipped, to make the Harbeths mine. I have no idea how I feel about this. One the one hand I'm excited to finally have an opportunity to hear these speakers, which many enthusiasts keep forever. On the other, I dread the inevitable weeks, if not months, of comparison with the SA1s, neurotically swapping speakers in a doomed attempt to fathom which pair I can "commit" to for the rest of my life.

    All this because I couldn't sleep, and had to pad downstairs to surf the hi-fi fora (that well known cure for insomnia).

    Solid, I fear that hanginmg out on this thread has turned me into a more neurotic speaker swapper than you are!

    Please help me!
    Nigel

  9. #1429
    Wammer
    Join Date
     Sep 2008
    Posts
     427
    Location
     Sheffield, UK
    Real Name
     Nigel
    Digital Source 1
     Marantz Pearl Lite
    Digital Source 2
     Sonos Connect
    Integrated Amp
     Marantz Pearl Lite
    Speakers
     KEF LS50
    In the Hi-Fi industry?
     No
    Amusingly, my moment of madness has saved a fellow wammer from himself:

    http://community.whathifi.com/forums...63.aspx#465963

    Note the language: "I have been on the brink of hitting the button half a dozen times in the last 10 minutes since I saw them". I know how you feel Chebby, mate!

  10. #1430
    Moderator HoopsOnToast's Avatar
    Join Date
     Feb 2006
    Posts
     10,702
    Location
     Faringdon
    Real Name
     Rob
    In the Hi-Fi industry?
     No
    Oooo nice, let us know what they are like, the harbeth speakers really interest me. They have a reputation about being from the same mould as Spendor/ LS3/5A's etc but with more speed and attack.
    Michell Gyrodec SE / SME M2-9 / AT33PTG / Trichord Dino - Sony DVP-S9000ES - Bryston B60 - Vandersteen 1C
    Other Bits: Decware Zen, Keesonic Kolt, Keesonic 701a

  11. #1431
    Founding Wammer SSM's Avatar
    Join Date
     Jul 2005
    Posts
     17,501
    Location
     Tipoca City
    DAC
     8
    Integrated Amp
     PP-1, SS-5
    Speakers
     12pr
    Pre Amp
     Triode-3, SS-1
    Power Amp
     SE-3, PP-2, SS-2, 1D
    Headphones
     LOL
    In the Hi-Fi industry?
     No
    lolololololhahahahahaha You're suffering from a worse case of smallboxtitus than moi, Drood. I've frozen my credit cards in the fridge and not due for another dosage of new speakersalami until January.

    Congrats on the Harbeth ownership. This is the one vital Beeb-box brand I'd neglected to check out (twice): when I bought my Leema and when I bought my Spendor. So I will really look forward to reading your thoughts on the shootout between the P3ESR and SA1. I might not opt for the SA1 come Jan as it may be quite as samey as the S3/5R. The additional of a Harbeth to my collection of toys may increase the diversity of sonic flavours!

    P3ESR, I keep seeing this word as PEESIR, mmm...


    pSS: your SA1's gloss piano black is more metrosexual on the eye than the incoming P3ESR's maple, IMO.
    Last edited by SSM; 20-07-2010 at 04:34 PM. Reason: Vanity;-)
    CONRAD-JOHNSON HD3 & ET3SE > SUN SV-2A3 L.E. 25th Anniv. SE Class A | NAIM DAC V1 > C-J CLASSIC 60SE PP
    PRIMARE DAC30 > AYRE K-5xeMP > 6V6GT SE Class A | audiolab M-DAC
    > ICON AUDIO LA4 MKIII > EL84 SE Class A
    MUSICAL FIDELITY X-T100
    (modded valve pre) > GENESIS Advanced Tech. M60 (& I60) PP | PRIMARE A34.2 Class D
    OMEGA SUPER ALNICO & 3i Monitors |
    PRECISION 6.2, ELAC BS244, ATC SCM11, S3/5R, Alnico, XERO, DM 2/6, Q 2020i
    SS relics: REGA ELICIT, ARCAM A38, Musical Fidelity X-A2, NAIM NAP 100, QUAD 909, SONY TA-F246E | (reserved)

  12. #1432
    Wammer
    Join Date
     Sep 2008
    Posts
     427
    Location
     Sheffield, UK
    Real Name
     Nigel
    Digital Source 1
     Marantz Pearl Lite
    Digital Source 2
     Sonos Connect
    Integrated Amp
     Marantz Pearl Lite
    Speakers
     KEF LS50
    In the Hi-Fi industry?
     No
    pSS: your SA1's gloss piano black is more metrosexual on the eye than the incoming P3ESR's maple, IMO.
    I agree. Even more so, now the SA1s sit atop Spendor's proprietary stands.
    No doubt this factor will add to the angst of the next couple of months :-(

  13. #1433
    Founding Wammer SSM's Avatar
    Join Date
     Jul 2005
    Posts
     17,501
    Location
     Tipoca City
    DAC
     8
    Integrated Amp
     PP-1, SS-5
    Speakers
     12pr
    Pre Amp
     Triode-3, SS-1
    Power Amp
     SE-3, PP-2, SS-2, 1D
    Headphones
     LOL
    In the Hi-Fi industry?
     No
    NAD C326BEE - the Moratorium

    This is the third and quite possibly the last NAD integrated amplifier I will ever own. With two more MF amps coming in, I'd thought I could carbon-freeze the C326 in the attic for emergency situations (what will those be) where some quick amp watts are needed. However, it got put up for sale and was snapped up by an eager punter almost as soon, with a handful more people on the reserve list. I never had any problem flogging off my NADs. They are the budget equivalent of Naims on the second-hand market.

    I bought the C326 at the start of this year on a whim and out of affectionate memory of the previous two NADs I had had which offered stellar service. The C326 continues NAD's acclaimed tradition of producing inexpensve amps with real world speaker driving ability. It may only be a 50-watter but it was able to generate prodigious sound levels from my trio of insensitive monitors (SCM11~80dB, S3/5R~82dB, Xero~84dB) without sounding strained at all. Particularly impressive were its ability to keep up with the SCM11's dynamism during difficult loud orchestral music, and its ability to generate a clean fluent sound from the S3/5R that esncouraged the ears to keep listening. It had good rhythmic timing too, albeit not as emphatic as the Creek EVO I had (hmmm, maybe shouldn't have sold that PRaTster), but nevertheless it could hone in on all the fun in dance music.

    Unfortunately the C326 had a Achilles heel. Its punchy delivery with up-tempo music is a result of a mid-bass that has been humped up a bit. While it didn't offend with such music, with orchestral tuttis where the percussion and double basses were diving into the deepest registers, it produced honks in the mid-bass that sounded hollow and wobbly. This was opposed to the tight grip my Musical Fidelity X-T100 had on the deep bass at all times. The effect was not so audible through the smaller cones of the S3/5R and Xero, but it stuck out on the SCM11's larger and heavier woofer. I can only surmise this blip is the result of the C326's voicing. The NAD engineers obviously envisioned that it is going to to be paired with small bookshelf speakers within its own price category; speakers that are usually weak in the mid-bass and need a bit of a boost there from a partnering amp. In that case, they were being market-savvy but their decision to voice the C326's mid-bass performance in this manner limits its ability to draw out the best from more expensive and more capable small monitors.

    Budget speakers usually come with cheap, shrieky tweeters and the C326's inoffensive treble is tuned to cope with those screamers. While it never sounded anything less than clear with the Spendor S3/5R's excellent soft domes, I had a bit of a shock when, after five months of this partnership I replaced it with a Musical Fidelity X-A2. The X-A2's design is almost a decade older than the C326 yet it compelled the S3/5R's treble to produce an exciting dynamic performance that stayed clean at all times. The C326's sounded static and less open by comparison. The X-A2's close attention to harmonic detailing also made it seem like there is a slight veil over the C326's midrange.

    Those mild sins of omission are certainly forgiveable given the C326's value-for-money rrp. The one factor that made me opt to sell it off was the unbelievable amount of heat it emitted from the ventilation slots atop its chassis. This is an A-B output tranny with a Class A preamp stage. The heat coming from those Class A modules is SCARY, even when there was 20cm of free space in the shelf for the dissipation. By comparison, the Class A-ish Cambridge Audio 840A V2 I demoed didn't feel as hot as this little NAD fooker. I once held a marshmallow on a toothpick over the C326's vents and it had a crisp coating after three minutes! A Subway cookie in its paper bag softened to melting chewiness within three minutes. These were startling, albeit delicious, experiments. It didn't help either that I remembered reading a disclaimer on NAD's official website several years ago warning customers who owned its Classic pre-power combo not to put the preamp directly on top of the power amp or give them insufficient ventilation, because there were cases where it "caught fire". My previous two NAD amps never ran that hot, so I dismissed that disclaimer as over-cautiousness on NAD's part. Now, having owned a new generation NAD amp, this C326, I'm not so sure if NAD pays that much attention to build quality issues on its post new-millennium models.

    That is just my personal misgiving. It's possible all C326BEEs can motor on for years despite this insane heat output, but I myself have no confidence to retain my little NAD oven.

    Anway, thanks NAD, for all the amp fun you provided me during my student days.


    NAD C326BEE
    : clean and powerful sound
    : good rhythmic timing
    : nice streamlined styling (compared to the C3*0 models)
    : its protuberant mid-bass limits its compatibility with better-designed speakers

    : treble could be more open and incisive
    : there is a slight veil over its midrange
    : runs hot enough to function as a snack grill






    Last edited by SSM; 18-09-2010 at 07:55 AM. Reason: Vanity;-)
    CONRAD-JOHNSON HD3 & ET3SE > SUN SV-2A3 L.E. 25th Anniv. SE Class A | NAIM DAC V1 > C-J CLASSIC 60SE PP
    PRIMARE DAC30 > AYRE K-5xeMP > 6V6GT SE Class A | audiolab M-DAC
    > ICON AUDIO LA4 MKIII > EL84 SE Class A
    MUSICAL FIDELITY X-T100
    (modded valve pre) > GENESIS Advanced Tech. M60 (& I60) PP | PRIMARE A34.2 Class D
    OMEGA SUPER ALNICO & 3i Monitors |
    PRECISION 6.2, ELAC BS244, ATC SCM11, S3/5R, Alnico, XERO, DM 2/6, Q 2020i
    SS relics: REGA ELICIT, ARCAM A38, Musical Fidelity X-A2, NAIM NAP 100, QUAD 909, SONY TA-F246E | (reserved)

  14. #1434
    Wammer Hornucopia's Avatar
    Join Date
     Feb 2009
    Posts
     4,577
    Location
     Bristol, , United Ki
    Real Name
     Chris
    Turn Table
     T- Rock.For sale
    T/Arm & Cart
     OL-Rega 300/Denon304
    SUT/Phono
     Hafler DH112
    Digital Source 1
     iMac.
    Digital Source 2
     Sony PS1 Modded alot
    DAC
     MHDT Havana-Sodmod
    Integrated Amp
     Kingrex usb
    Speakers
     Ocellia Calliope .21
    Pre Amp
     Hafler DH101/112 mod
    Power Amp
     Pass F3/Hafler 200md
    Headphones
     Wharfedale Isodynami
    In the Hi-Fi industry?
     No
    Did anyone ever mod them?
    Tolerance is not a Sapiens characteristic.

  15. #1435
    Founding Wammer SSM's Avatar
    Join Date
     Jul 2005
    Posts
     17,501
    Location
     Tipoca City
    DAC
     8
    Integrated Amp
     PP-1, SS-5
    Speakers
     12pr
    Pre Amp
     Triode-3, SS-1
    Power Amp
     SE-3, PP-2, SS-2, 1D
    Headphones
     LOL
    In the Hi-Fi industry?
     No
    Quote Originally Posted by Hornucopia View Post
    Did anyone ever mod them?
    Nah. I was the first owner.
    Just did a google. There are a few other peeps on the WHF forum tawking about their C326 hotcakes. Good luck Naddies.


    SS


    ps: may I add that the headphone socket on the C326 has very good sound quality (for a non-dedicated headphone amp, that is). I mucked around with several cans, and they played with nice clarity through the C326.
    Last edited by SSM; 18-09-2010 at 12:44 PM.
    CONRAD-JOHNSON HD3 & ET3SE > SUN SV-2A3 L.E. 25th Anniv. SE Class A | NAIM DAC V1 > C-J CLASSIC 60SE PP
    PRIMARE DAC30 > AYRE K-5xeMP > 6V6GT SE Class A | audiolab M-DAC
    > ICON AUDIO LA4 MKIII > EL84 SE Class A
    MUSICAL FIDELITY X-T100
    (modded valve pre) > GENESIS Advanced Tech. M60 (& I60) PP | PRIMARE A34.2 Class D
    OMEGA SUPER ALNICO & 3i Monitors |
    PRECISION 6.2, ELAC BS244, ATC SCM11, S3/5R, Alnico, XERO, DM 2/6, Q 2020i
    SS relics: REGA ELICIT, ARCAM A38, Musical Fidelity X-A2, NAIM NAP 100, QUAD 909, SONY TA-F246E | (reserved)

  16. #1436
    Super Wammer Jimmy Moff's Avatar
    Join Date
     Nov 2006
    Posts
     834
    Location
     Lancaster (ish)
    Real Name
     Jim
    Turn Table
     Rega P3
    SUT/Phono
     Rega Fono MM
    Digital Source 1
     Meridian 506.20
    Digital Source 2
     iPod Touch 4
    DAC
     Arcam rBlink
    Integrated Amp
     Sugden A21a
    Speakers
     Totem Arros
    In the Hi-Fi industry?
     No
    Hello Solid,

    I enjoyed your moratorium on the NAD C326BEE. I'm running one with a Meridian 506 cd player and Royd Sintra II speakers. This was supposed to be a second system for listening to in the back room whilst studying but I find myself listening to it more than my main system these days. It's just a great little system and so enjoyable to listen to. Must be some strange synergy going on :-)

    I agree that the NAD is a particularly good amp for the money and I would suggest that a less critical listener than yourself (me for example!) would find abolutely no fault with it at all. Like you, I have found the headphone socket to be perfectly fine too.

    They do get a bit warm but if you really want to cook on your hifi equipment, I recommend you check out Sugden's products.

    By the way, compared with my Sugden A21a the NAD is slightly less extended in the treble but I can't detect much difference in bass performance. By the way I do generally listen to rock, soul and jazz (plus a little classical). Up-tempo music by and large.

    All the best

    Jim
    Last edited by Jimmy Moff; 19-09-2010 at 06:34 PM. Reason: I am a numpty

  17. #1437
    Founding Wammer SSM's Avatar
    Join Date
     Jul 2005
    Posts
     17,501
    Location
     Tipoca City
    DAC
     8
    Integrated Amp
     PP-1, SS-5
    Speakers
     12pr
    Pre Amp
     Triode-3, SS-1
    Power Amp
     SE-3, PP-2, SS-2, 1D
    Headphones
     LOL
    In the Hi-Fi industry?
     No
    Hey Jimmy, long time no see

    How nice it is that we both use the C326. I hope you don't misconstrue my report on it as the nit-picking of a golden-eared audiophool 'coz I'm not one. I still hold the C326's sonic abilities in high regard. Like your own experiences in your second system, I have found the C326 to make very persuasive music with my sympathetic S3/5R so much so at one point in time I hardly listened to my main rig for a month. However, the C326's mid-bass hump didn't go down as well with the SCM11 - which has always been a merciless revealer of any foibles in the equipment chain upstream. Here it became apparent where the NAD designers have tweaked its bass response to stray from neutrality. The SCM11's heavy woofer requires more grip. Compared to the two MF amps and the Creek EVO, the C326 made loose bass sounds with the SCM11. I guess this is a case of poor synergy.

    I would have been very happy to keep the C326-S3/5R combo going if it weren't for a chance purchase of the X-A2. That substitution showed the difference in treble clarity between the two.

    So cheers to you and your C326.

    SS


    ps: I can send you a bag of pink marshmallows for toasting if you like.
    Last edited by SSM; 19-09-2010 at 06:56 PM. Reason: Vanity;-)
    CONRAD-JOHNSON HD3 & ET3SE > SUN SV-2A3 L.E. 25th Anniv. SE Class A | NAIM DAC V1 > C-J CLASSIC 60SE PP
    PRIMARE DAC30 > AYRE K-5xeMP > 6V6GT SE Class A | audiolab M-DAC
    > ICON AUDIO LA4 MKIII > EL84 SE Class A
    MUSICAL FIDELITY X-T100
    (modded valve pre) > GENESIS Advanced Tech. M60 (& I60) PP | PRIMARE A34.2 Class D
    OMEGA SUPER ALNICO & 3i Monitors |
    PRECISION 6.2, ELAC BS244, ATC SCM11, S3/5R, Alnico, XERO, DM 2/6, Q 2020i
    SS relics: REGA ELICIT, ARCAM A38, Musical Fidelity X-A2, NAIM NAP 100, QUAD 909, SONY TA-F246E | (reserved)

  18. #1438
    Super Wammer Jimmy Moff's Avatar
    Join Date
     Nov 2006
    Posts
     834
    Location
     Lancaster (ish)
    Real Name
     Jim
    Turn Table
     Rega P3
    SUT/Phono
     Rega Fono MM
    Digital Source 1
     Meridian 506.20
    Digital Source 2
     iPod Touch 4
    DAC
     Arcam rBlink
    Integrated Amp
     Sugden A21a
    Speakers
     Totem Arros
    In the Hi-Fi industry?
     No
    Hmm, would probably end up with a sticky pink sugary mess all over the insides of my amp. Will just stick to warming pies on the Sugden.

  19. #1439
    Founding Wammer SSM's Avatar
    Join Date
     Jul 2005
    Posts
     17,501
    Location
     Tipoca City
    DAC
     8
    Integrated Amp
     PP-1, SS-5
    Speakers
     12pr
    Pre Amp
     Triode-3, SS-1
    Power Amp
     SE-3, PP-2, SS-2, 1D
    Headphones
     LOL
    In the Hi-Fi industry?
     No
    Musical Fidelity X-A2 integrated amplifier - the original and the modified version
    (a retroreview for the titillation of all MF fanboys)


    The first MF 'X' amp I owned was the X-A1. It was a lovely amp with an iconic design and can still hold its own against the current crop of 600-ish amps IMO. I regretted selling it, a regret exacerbated by the collector's item status accorded to the original 'X' series today. So it was with great delight that I managed, after vying with another MF devotee, to nab this X-A2 the replacement model for the X-A1. I shall never sell this precious 'X' lozenge, ever!

    The X-A2 is not a X-A1 successor with lightly fluffed-up internals and a change in the LED colour of the power indicator (from red to blue). Its design is the same as the 1000 X-A100R, but minus the remote control and priced competitively to wreak havoc on then 500 rivals. Herein we see the original design ethos of the 'X' series before audiogod A.M. had a brain fart with the subsequent X series. The power transformer of the X-A2 (same one used for the A-100R) is housed in a separate black box and linked to the lozenge-shaped main unit via a single cord. It was designed thus to be placed on the floor and "as far away from the X-A2 as possible", to thwart EMI (not that record company which specializes in classical CDs with sewage-quality sonics, but ElectroMagnetic Interference). Innovative thinking.

    Well then, er, in the succeeding v3 X series, of which I had the X-80 and X-150, the power transformers were housed inside the same chassis as the amps. Then in the 3rd generation of X components (mystifiably designated the v8 series), of which I still own, the X-T100's power transformer is once again made separate but this time housed in a box with matching aesthetics so it can be positioned next to the sensitive main unit. Errr...

    I reckon the original X series' design which completely isolates the power transformer makes more sense. I do wonder what will happen to the power transformer should there be a fourth X series; likely v9 (coming soon, especially if the current MF ranges flop.)

    The X-A2's rated power is 75W. MF has a tradition of understating its amps' power specification and IIRC the first review in HFC measured it to as being closer to 95W. In use, it certainly feels like a high current 100-watter. The X-A2 has more than enough firepower to set my trio of insensitive monitors (80,82&84dB) ablaze.


    Sound Quality

    The sonic signature of MF amplification has several defining characteristics that remain identifiable even when it evolves subtly with every new range. While the X-A2 doesn't sound exactly the same as my X-T100 or the X-150, it shares a common penchant for presenting all music genres in a smooth, flowing and full-bodied manner. This is the archetypal MF sound. Big and rich, yet not lacking fine detail. When orchestral instruments are playing, you get the impression that all the complex harmonic content of their tones is fully reproduced. All MF amps are great with classical music and the X-A2 is no exception. Being an older design than the X-150 and X-T100, I half-expected it to lag in dynamic expression. The 50W X-A1 and X-80 could falter when reproducing large-scale finales in Wagner's operas, specifically his huge, dense Ring. Surprisingly, the X-A2 coped better... much better. In fact, the dynamic slam it could muster across the registers at high playback levels shocked me on several occasions. I guess the 50% hike in power over the X-A1 and the uprated circuitry make the difference. In this respect it is equal to the X-T100 and X-150.

    This dynamic ability meant the X-A2 could control the ATC SCM11's heavy woofers with the same authority as the X-T100, whereas the NAD C326BEE faltered and the Creek EVO blinked on occasions. What the two smaller amps have in advantage over the X-A2 is their agility in the mid-bass; they pump out synthesizer bass lines with more PRaT than the X-A2 can muster and are consequently more toe-tapping with pop music. The X-A2's midbass is timid by comparison. While it can still shape mid-bass notes cleanly, it isn't as prominent or as emphatic in its reproduction. In this respect, it is less entertaining with fast-paced, beat-driven music.

    That Achilles heel is offset by the X-A2'a ability in the treble and lower bass. In the former, it is more open, clean and extended than either the EVO or C326BEE. The X-A2 was purchased with the intention of replacing the hot-running C326 as partner to the Spendor S3/5R. The C326 didn't disgrace itself in the Spendor's company but when the X-A2 was slotted in, the S3/5R's treble performance went up a couple of notches. The brilliance of the X-A2's upper registers enhanced the spaciousness of the already well-aerated Spendor sound. It also had this exciting yet disciplined attack that made orchestral brass perorations very thrilling. And the slam in the lower bass! It drew out all the bass the S3/5R had and made it sound much weightier than with the C326. Double basses grumbled and timpani rumbled with a new-found gravitas. The diminuative S3/5R stopped giving any impression that it was a mini monitor with limited low-end grunt. Within my study, it had seemingly transformed from Bruce Banner to the Hulk. Smashing.

    Discussed separately on forums, MF and Spendor often cop the derision of being 'pipe n slippers' brands. I honestly cannot see how that can apply to the X-A2 and S3/5R. Paired together they are electrifying with symphonic and acoustic music. It is quite an edge-of-the-seat experience. (For pop and rock though, a Nait5i-Epos M12i pairing can outpace them IMO.) In absolute terms, I reckon the X-A2 is tailored with a couple of decibels boost to its frequency extremes. The S3/5R meanwhile seems to have a mild mid-bass boost. Thus they complement each other very well. The sound is impeccably smooth yet detailed, underpinned with very fulsome bass that belies the size of the S3/5R's five-inch woofers.


    X-T100 prevails...

    MF detractors who parrot on about how MF only reboxes its amps with each new range will be disappointed to know that the X-A2 and X-T100 don't sound the same. The latter is a hybrid design and bathes music in a burnished lustre. The X-A2 is less luscious in the midrange and not as taut in the bass, conceding the last ounce of control to the X-T100. It thus sounds fuller in this region and casts a bigger soundstage, but at the expense of imaging of which the X-T100's is better. The X-T100 also has superior resolution. When listening in a critical mood, it can be discerned that the X-A2 casts a slight opaque pall over the lower registers of female singers, whereas the X-T100 illumines that area very clearly. And that is with the X-T100's stock tubes. After a second bout of tube-rolling, it surges ahead in midband clarity. It is the X amp I would bring to a desert island.


    X-A2's knob needs more tweaking...


    If you're in the market for a pre-loved X-A2 yourself, you need to know that the gain setting on its volume knob is much more gradual than newer MF amps. Whereas the X-T100's already cooks at 9 o'clock and reaches ear-drum melting levels at 11, even with the inefficient SCM11, the X-A2's juice only begins to flow at 11 o'clock. I was initially concerned by this seeming lack in power but allayed such fears after a conversation with a fellow X-A2 wammer Alex_A (thanks gingerboi). He has jacked his knob past 3 o'clock on a few occasions (is that proper Inglish), yet it stayed clean at all times. So take note. Good times with the X-A2 start after 11 o'clock.


    Modern alternatives

    Being a sucker for shiny new things, buying a pre-loved amp wasn't the first priority when I started to look for another partner for the S3/5R. I demoed three models in the 400ish range: Cambridge Audio 650A, Rotel RA-05SE and Yamaha A-S700. All are competent modern designs but I sought a particular attribute which eluded them: a wonderful upper register that will accentuate and not subtract from the S3/5R's own smoothness and openness.

    The 650A's treble had artificial brightness while the RA-05SE's was a touch synthetic and lacked the supple, flowing quality I sought. Yammy's A-S700 looked retro-cool. It had the cleanest treble response of the trio but wasn't detailed enough. It also lagged behind the outgoing C326BEE for dynamic punch and could create the dreaded 'pipe 'n slippers sound' with the S3/5R, I feared.

    So should I be smug or alarmed that the cultured-sounding X-A2 can do what the above modern amps cannot? Mags constantly wag about improvements in the technology of today's affordable amps, how yesteryear's 1k performance can be had for modest rrp, but I couldn't find one with a superlative treble performance. (I would like to, because I wouldn't have to spend crazy money to get another impeccable amp to fix up with my next pair of mini monitors.)

    If I were to extend the comparison to the more expensive amps I had looked at for my main rig, I'd say I prefer the X-A2's treble to the Rotel RA-1520's(bright), the Roksan Kandy K2's(slightly truncated; to offset previous Kandys' shrillness?), the Naim Nait 5i's(shut-in) and the Nait XS's (without the Flatcap add-on).


    On the horizon... a Thouch-up

    At the time of penning this part, the X-A2 has been despatched off for a bout of modification to improve its sonics. After scouring the classifieds for free-lance tweakers I settled on a dude (such thick eyebrows) who used to service Thule amplifiers. I specified the changes I want for the X-A2's sound: leave the fine treble as it is, improve clarity across the midrange, quicken the mid-bass response and tighten up the lower bass. Having heard the zippy quicksilver sound from a Thule amp once I reckon the X-A2 will return like a phoenix arisen from the ashes, with a new-found ability in PRaT. Basically, the sonics I'm after is MF for the top half of the frequency spectrum and Naim Nait-esque for the bottom half (audio-hell if it were the other way round). I'd given some consideration to taking the X-A2 back to the MF dealer for refurbishment but desisted as the good Sodbury said the MF tune-ups are just expensive little tickles which amount to putting new rubber bands around the capacitors.

    This is the first time I have sent an amp for personalized modification and if the results are sensational, I may source other vintage MF amps for the same treatment (the X-150 with its huge knob will be highly desirable. SQUEEEE!!!). After years of having to shortlist, demo, buy and then live with new amps that have a few quirks not to my liking, perhaps the customized modding option is what I really need. Watch this space...



    Musical Fidelity X-A2 (original form)

    : powerful, weighty sound
    : open, detailed treble
    : good slam in the lower bass
    : mid-bass is a touch laidback
    : the volume knob's slow gain gives the impression of a lack of power
    : the X-T100 edges it for resolution



    [UPDATE]

    The X-A2 is back and its main unit feels slightly heavier in my hands. After a fortnight of anticipation I finally found out if this modding adventure had a happy ending.

    My initial reaction after the X-A2 was first fired up was to shed an invisible tear. That was because the original sound of the X-A2 had perished. Gone is the comforting MF house-sound that has a slight warmth in the bass. But the tear turned to elation when my ears became attuned to the new sound of the X-A2. There is a new-found swiftness in the bass and improved clarity in the midrange. Just what I had hoped the commissioned technician would effect. The first test material I played wasn't a CD but the Clash of the Titans (2010) DVD, fast-forwarded to the scene of the Kraken's emergence. It was the last thing I played through the original X-A2. Now, the sound of its tentacles bursting out from the sea cracked with greater impact. And when it opened its jaws to roar, there was this resonance in the X-A2's upper registers that showed a widening of left to right imaging. The overall presentation is also more forward and vital.

    The midrange has also improved in clarity as a test of several Celine Dion songs revealed. Where on the original X-A2 her lower register was slightly veiled, now her voice shot out with laser-like clarity that was as wonderful to hear as the Kraken's roars. The mid-bass has gained sharper articulation and speed which makes the X-A2 quite a PRaTster now. It doesn't have the grunty ruggedness of a Nait (but of course... if I want that particular quality I should invest in a Naim amp), but it no longer makes the X-A2 a liability with fast-paced pop music. It can rock out.

    The downside to this keener articulation is a fractional loss of weight in the low bass. It doesn't underpin orchestral tuttis like the massive boulder it was, but the overall presentation still remains weightier than the X-T100's. I guess this is a trade-off for the gain of that agility in the mid-bass. It is most acceptable.

    The new sound has certain traits in common with that Thule Spirit amp I heard; namely a swiftness in the upper registers and an upfront wide screen presentation. I hereby christen it "Le SSpirit"!

    Darn, I think I'm loving the X-A2 more than the tube-rolled X-T100 at the moment.


    Musical Fidelity X-A2 ~ "Le SSpirit" (modified form)
    : scintillating speed and clarity
    : improved rhythmic timing
    : punchy mid-bass
    : low bass is a smidgeon less fulsome than the original
    Last edited by SSM; 19-11-2010 at 03:09 PM. Reason: Vanity;-)
    CONRAD-JOHNSON HD3 & ET3SE > SUN SV-2A3 L.E. 25th Anniv. SE Class A | NAIM DAC V1 > C-J CLASSIC 60SE PP
    PRIMARE DAC30 > AYRE K-5xeMP > 6V6GT SE Class A | audiolab M-DAC
    > ICON AUDIO LA4 MKIII > EL84 SE Class A
    MUSICAL FIDELITY X-T100
    (modded valve pre) > GENESIS Advanced Tech. M60 (& I60) PP | PRIMARE A34.2 Class D
    OMEGA SUPER ALNICO & 3i Monitors |
    PRECISION 6.2, ELAC BS244, ATC SCM11, S3/5R, Alnico, XERO, DM 2/6, Q 2020i
    SS relics: REGA ELICIT, ARCAM A38, Musical Fidelity X-A2, NAIM NAP 100, QUAD 909, SONY TA-F246E | (reserved)

  20. #1440
    Super Wammer stewartwen's Avatar
    Join Date
     Aug 2006
    Posts
     3,625
    Location
     near Blackpool
    Real Name
     Stewart
    Turn Table
     NOT AT THE MOMENT!
    Digital Source 1
     Yes I have one
    Integrated Amp
     DenonAVPA1/Crown
    Speakers
     IAS, horns, modified
    In the Hi-Fi industry?
     No
    What excellent prose Solid! A veritable feast of information in that piece. I have owned, and sold, quite a few MF amplifiers. I have found that the early amps had something that the new stuff doesn't even begin to display. Although I am wary about sending my ancient B1 to MF for rebuild/service.
    Thank you for a really great overview on Anthony's eqpt.
    S
    I am just a soul boy at heart.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •