Long story short. I bought a minidsp SHD, which ASR gave a good measurement of. He apparently found some poor power implementation induced jitter causing a noise floor of 112db or something, which he brushed under the carpet, saying that it was below the audible spectrum of human hearing. And this was followed by many members in his forum, claiming that minidsp SHD was a state of the art dac, and one did'nt need spend any more looking for a better a dac.
So I plug in the minidsp for a listen. The thing just sucked. So switched off my poweramps, and kept playing music through it for 48 hrs straight, just incase it was a case of burn in.
So I get back and play it. And the typical ESS Sabre chip sound greets me. And I don't like ESS sound, as I find it lean ( I personally prefer the AKM and Phillips crowned TDA chips sound, amd never heard a Burr brown or AD so can't comment. But I loved the Phillips crowned TDA chips ). And when the manufacturer skimps on the analogue output stage of a ESS chip, I find it suffering from digitalisis. Which is a harsh edge to the ending notes in the treble. Which the minidsp SHD had, but that is okay I thought, it is just the chip's trade mark sound, that lot of others like. So it is just my personal taste.And no need for forum members to agree or disagree with my personal tastes in musical presentation.
So I carry on...and below are the differences I find between my 9 year old esoteric dac and the minidsp SHD :
1. First thing I noticed on hitting play, was a much reduced sound stage. It was like all the musicians were cramped into a smaller space.
2. Second thing, was a increased noise floor. The silent passages were not as silent as before. There was a certain underlying grain in the back ground.
3. Next the tone of instruments was different. I don't know which is right among the two, as I don't have exposure to live sound. So I will let this pass
4. Now comes the main thing for me...I spin gergio by moroder from the "Random acess memories" album, and when the drumming gets complex. It sounds like a cacophony on the minidsp shd. There is no instrumental separation. Everything is one mess coming from the center of the speakers, and the cymbal hits are just shreiking. And it is impossible to follow individual instruments. Whereas the esoteric layers the same crazy notes into organised and easily followable sound.
So I had this conversation with a friend, who visited me today evening with his falcon speakers and a sugden 21 amp to try in my room and with my dac. And first thing he said was, that Amir runs a 1khz sweep for all his measurements. And Topping is coming up with a dac that measures the best at this 1khz. And a lot of people could make a dac that measures better than the most acclaimed dacs at 1 kHz. But could completely suck when it comes to listening. And Amir himself doesn't post any listening impressions, claiming he is busy. As actual listening would completely unravel the measurement vs listening differences, and many dacs he posts as the greatest, could fall on their face. And that would completely collapse the site and following he built, based on measurements.
So is my friend right or Amir. My listening impressions strongly go to the listening side.
And please let's not drag stereophonic measurements of speakers, and keep this restricted to measurement of a dac's prowess by running a 1 kHz sine wave or anything else that Amir does, claiming to be the true measure of a dac.
P.S: And sirs, let's please keep this civil
So I plug in the minidsp for a listen. The thing just sucked. So switched off my poweramps, and kept playing music through it for 48 hrs straight, just incase it was a case of burn in.
So I get back and play it. And the typical ESS Sabre chip sound greets me. And I don't like ESS sound, as I find it lean ( I personally prefer the AKM and Phillips crowned TDA chips sound, amd never heard a Burr brown or AD so can't comment. But I loved the Phillips crowned TDA chips ). And when the manufacturer skimps on the analogue output stage of a ESS chip, I find it suffering from digitalisis. Which is a harsh edge to the ending notes in the treble. Which the minidsp SHD had, but that is okay I thought, it is just the chip's trade mark sound, that lot of others like. So it is just my personal taste.And no need for forum members to agree or disagree with my personal tastes in musical presentation.
So I carry on...and below are the differences I find between my 9 year old esoteric dac and the minidsp SHD :
1. First thing I noticed on hitting play, was a much reduced sound stage. It was like all the musicians were cramped into a smaller space.
2. Second thing, was a increased noise floor. The silent passages were not as silent as before. There was a certain underlying grain in the back ground.
3. Next the tone of instruments was different. I don't know which is right among the two, as I don't have exposure to live sound. So I will let this pass
4. Now comes the main thing for me...I spin gergio by moroder from the "Random acess memories" album, and when the drumming gets complex. It sounds like a cacophony on the minidsp shd. There is no instrumental separation. Everything is one mess coming from the center of the speakers, and the cymbal hits are just shreiking. And it is impossible to follow individual instruments. Whereas the esoteric layers the same crazy notes into organised and easily followable sound.
So I had this conversation with a friend, who visited me today evening with his falcon speakers and a sugden 21 amp to try in my room and with my dac. And first thing he said was, that Amir runs a 1khz sweep for all his measurements. And Topping is coming up with a dac that measures the best at this 1khz. And a lot of people could make a dac that measures better than the most acclaimed dacs at 1 kHz. But could completely suck when it comes to listening. And Amir himself doesn't post any listening impressions, claiming he is busy. As actual listening would completely unravel the measurement vs listening differences, and many dacs he posts as the greatest, could fall on their face. And that would completely collapse the site and following he built, based on measurements.
So is my friend right or Amir. My listening impressions strongly go to the listening side.
And please let's not drag stereophonic measurements of speakers, and keep this restricted to measurement of a dac's prowess by running a 1 kHz sine wave or anything else that Amir does, claiming to be the true measure of a dac.
P.S: And sirs, let's please keep this civil