On the right speakers maybe but need the right ones first.Well set up subs will improve more than just the bass.
On the right speakers maybe but need the right ones first.Well set up subs will improve more than just the bass.
Definitely not! There is so much more to a speaker than bass.
Yes, it will be noticeable but for all the wrong reasons.
What happened to clarity and texture? In your photo, those speakers are designed not to have to use subwoofers and at the price they are, why should or would you need to spend extra.I disagree. As I've said before with all things being equal a subwoofer is the most important component. Ideally frequencies up to 90Hz should be unburdened from the mains and this LF burden passed on to a subwoofer to deal with.
I believe to achieve 'realism' requires power and even if the mains go down to 20Hz a subwoofer should still be incorporated because in my experience a subwoofer can inject power into and energise a system like no other component can.
The goal is to effectively align, calibrate, dial in a subwoofer so that the subwoofer integrates seamlessly with the mains and disappears into the soundstage with a deep, sharp, tight fisted, fast and powerful punchy sub bass.
Eg. system below featuring KEF Reference 3's and dual JL Audio Fathom f112 v2's , JL Audio CR-1 active subwoofer crossover has a crossover point set @ 90Hz -
![]()
No power. No depth. No depth. No body. No body. No soul to the sound.
I use a pair of REL TX5 subs with a pair of standmount speakers, and even these second from the bottom of the REL range have seriously clear powerful bass in a small to medium room. As well as the bass, subs also improve the midrange solidity, texture and imaging. I personally believe pairs of subs are best, along with acoustic treatment in the form of bass traps to alleviate room modes.I understand that better speakers will give the most benefit.
I do appreciate the dealer bringing it up, it is not because of personal gain for him. The sub he was mentioning would be 1500€, where I am considering to spend a lot more on speakers.
I'll need to look up how REL subs work though, as there does not seem to be any frequency filtering involved (the speakers keep playing the low frequencies)
Maybe some wammers are happy with their subs but I always have heard the speakers and sub separately rather than having an integrated sound. I would just find a decent pair of speakers that you like and avoid subs as it just adds an unnecessary complication.Thanks for all the concerns, I will offcourse demo at home before buying!
A curveball by one of the dealers on Friday: it might be a bigger improvement to include a sub, then change to floorstanders.
What are your thoughts in this? I hadn't considered a sub, but can understand that it might have a big impact.
I would think that upgrading to better speakers would be a first step and a sub can follow at a later stage.
What happened to clarity and texture? In your photo, those speakers are designed not to have to use subwoofers and at the price they are, why should or would you need to spend extra.
I’m not saying that subwoofers are not a benefit but at what price.
I always have heard the speakers and sub separately rather than having an integrated sound. I would just find a decent pair of speakers that you like and avoid subs as it just adds an unnecessary complication.
The fact that a sub needs to integrate, by definition, is a distraction when there are speakers that you sell that are perfectly fine without a sub woofer. It’s also another box in the room that may need to be placed in an inconvenient location. Have you seen the OP’s photos of his lounge? He has enough challenges with the room as it is.A sub/sat pairing becomes an unnecessary complication and a distraction due to improper integration. The goal is to effectively align, calibrate and dial in a subwoofer so that the subwoofer integrates seamlessly with the mains and disappears into the soundstage with a deep, sharp, tight fisted, fast and powerful punchy sub bass.
Maybe some wammers are happy with their subs but I always have heard the speakers and sub separately rather than having an integrated sound. I would just find a decent pair of speakers that you like and avoid subs as it just adds an unnecessary complication.
Agreed. The fact that a 12k floorstander speaker needs a sub is a red flag or room is wrong.The fact that a sub needs to integrate, by definition, is a distraction when there are speakers that you sell that are perfectly fine without a sub woofer. It’s also another box in the room that may need to be placed in an inconvenient location. Have you seen the OP’s photos of his lounge? He has enough challenges with the room as it is.
Yes Rick, we would all love rooms like that but we are in the real world.With the mains unburdened of frequencies of up to 90Hz there is less compression distortion, current is not being sucked out of the amplifier at LF's, etc.
As I've said before bass is foundation of sound and the stronger the foundations are the better everything else above will be supported. Clarity, texture, etc. can all greatly improve irrespective of the mains. A subwoofer is the most important component -
![]()
Dual JL Audio E112's supporting Tannoy Arden Legacy satellites
![]()
Dual JL Audio Gotham g213 v2's supporting McIntosh XRT2.1K satellites
perfectly fine without a sub woofer. It’s also another box in the room that may need to be placed in an inconvenient location. Have you seen the OP’s photos of his lounge? He has enough challenges with the room as it is.
Agreed. The fact that a 12k floorstander speaker needs a sub is a red flag or room is wrong.
No problem having subs but a speaker of that sort (Kef) is designed to run without.
You can always improve on any Speaker Rick but at what cost.Sorry to say but even though those speakers have good LF however they don't have the extension and also are not capable of producing anywhere near quality of LF's and ultimately are not as capable of supporting the system as a whole as well the Fathom f112 v2's.
A sub/sat pairing becomes an unnecessary complication and a distraction due to improper integration. The goal is to effectively align, calibrate and dial in a subwoofer so that the subwoofer integrates seamlessly with the mains and disappears into the soundstage with a deep, sharp, tight fisted, fast and powerful punchy sub bass.
I have these KEF’s and for the size of my room I don’t think need a sub. Their bass is perfectly fine for me and it can thump on my chest and rattle some of our furnitures. And I’m not a bass nut or a young spoiled brat that always impress friends with room shaking bass.😀. As you’ve already mentioned Jon home demo is a must. 👍Agreed. The fact that a 12k floorstander speaker needs a sub is a red flag or room is wrong.
No problem having subs but a speaker of that sort (Kef) is designed to run without.
As @Musicraft explained adding subs has four advantages:oh my gosh ... using subs with ardens !!! i only use eatons and they certainly dont need subs .. however rick you are more experinced than I in these matters !