Martin Logan Vista electrostatic-dynamic hybrid

G

Guest

Guest
Was offered a loan by a local dealer of some Martin Logan Vistas on demo - £4,000 worth of entry level esl-cone hybrids. Were a little out of my league financially as they were essentially new but he was kind enough to let me have a go at them. To be fair I might well have pushed the boat out to get them if they wereseriously ESL beaters,but it's always a risk giving anything else to a dyed in the wool Quad nut like yours truly.

Anyway it's been an interesting time. The first night I spent listening only to CD (as I had sold my LP12 and was waiting to collect its replacement).

Was quite enjoyable but things took a strange turn when the wife sat down to join me for the Buxtehude Op1s. ''Why does the viola da gamba sound like it's coming out of the bottom of the speaker while the violin iscoming from higher up?' she says.

Checking this out, it seemed to be an artefact of the crossover frequency and the placement of the panels and woofer (this jumped out at her without her being told about the construction at all). With chamber music the crossover is quite obvious, especially once it's pointed out - I checked the ML site and the crossover is around 450hz, abouttheAabove middle C. On strings that's above most violinparts,in the middle of the viola register,and right at the top of most cello parts- so the instruments in a string quarter split fairly closelytop bottom, giving a weird sensation of a pair of tall violinists, a midget cellist and a slightly confused viola player!

I didn't notice this effect at all with some Donald Fagan which sounded very lively, and actually they sounded pretty good with orchestras too because the sound is much more evenly distributed vertically (they really do orchestras rather well, capturingwell the richness and harmonic complexity). High sopranos also sounded very good - pretty much as good as the Quads with the supertweeters. Janowitz was in her element. You don't notice the crossover so much with pianos either because the low notes produce a lot of harmonics that carry on up the frequency range.

What I thought they were very nice for was acoustic &jazz, much more air and space than the Quads and they did low double bass surprisingly well for the size of the little woofer, except for the verylowest notes (you'd need a sub I think anyway). I don't think I've heard John Martyn sound better, heard some new Rhodes piano details I'd never clocked before, not bad for an album I first bought when I was at school in the 70s!

But there was a bit of fluff in the bellybutton. Maybe it was my EAR V20 (only 20 watts) that wasstruggling to drive the 8in woofer cones (supposed to be 90db but seemed a harder load than my 86db Quad ESLs) or perhaps it wasa characteristic of the speakers, but thelower midrange,the bit below thecrossover, seemed a bit on the thin side compared to therichness and volume of the panel.I found myself turning them up to hear the lower registers, only to find that the treble then became a bit overpowering - almost like the woofer and the panel weren't all that well matched for sensitivity. Would be interesting to see the impedence figures on these, whether it's a design flaw or just a problem with low power valves. Might be no problem at all with 200w SS monoblocs of course ....

Indeed, I think these would be rathera different story with a slightly bigger woofer gettingmore power and maybe a tweaked crossover to manage the blend a bit less abruptly(the panel needs to come lower, I would say at least another octave to 200hz or lower as the crossover frequency is more obvious than in a conventional speaker because of the physical layout, so needs to be placed somewhere there's less musical 'action'. But then again maybe I just notice the effect of crossovers more than most people having had full-range horns for a while before going tothe Quads which are also full range of course.

Interesting experience, they were definitely brighter than the Quads (which fade out by 14-15khz, hence the Townshend supertweeters I use with them) and have a richer expression of harmonics, and a lot more house-friendly shape ... they are probably still better than any box speaker I've heard in a long while, and if I listened to more orchestral music and less vocal and chamberwe might have a different conclusion ... but all together whileI could probably live with them, they don't quite do everything quite so well as the Quads do, at least with chamber and baroque music, through my valve amp.

All that sounds as if these were somewhatless than fantastic (especially for £4000 new) but actually it's been a bit of a game of two halves andI've beengetting along much better with them this evening, breaking in the Townshend Rock Reference I just brought home (see post in the 2channel forum). While the design and power limitations above still apply, theRock seems to be feeding them with better information which theML panels in particular are making very nice use of.

Anyway I'm most grateful to the local dealer for the chance to hear these, I wont be buying this time butI'm beginning to appreciate what we miss by internet box swapping (and what it costs us in hassle, downtime and a slice off the price every time we do a catch-and-release exercise) - some dealers are a long way from the pushy 'wot brands we sell is the only good stuff on the market stereotype' and the better ones ideally should be supported where possible/sensible.

Pic below, see turntable-sized gap!

 

DaveJones

Wammer
Wammer
Apr 19, 2009
245
17
48
Walsall
AKA
Dave
HiFi Trade?
  1. No
An excellent review that I found really educational. I have a pair of Clarities, which I love, and had never really noticed the crossover issue, but then I don't listen to much (any) chamber music, and I use a more powerful amp.

Thanks,

Dave

 

JANDL100

Wammer
Wammer Plus
Dec 5, 2006
20,120
7,846
208
Forest of Dean, Glos
AKA
Jerry
HiFi Trade?
  1. No
An interesting review, indeed - from a listener with substantially overlapping musical tastes to my own.

I've not heard the ML Vista, but other ML hybrids I have heard have always had panel/bass disjoint issues. Not so with some other stat hybrids (e.g. my old Electrostatic Research Vista II - the same name is coincidental I am sure!) so it isn't necessarily a fault with the genre. The stat panels on the ERs was much bigger than on your ML Vistas so I am surethey went significantly lower in frequency. Mind you, I had the same issues when demoing large ML hybrids, so ....

If you fancy a rather more open window & explicit presentation than you get with your Quad esl57, I can strongly recommend the ML CLSiiz full range stats that I use.

 

AmDismal

Wammer
Wammer
Apr 22, 2007
9,277
134
108
JANDL100 wrote:

If you fancy a rather more open window & explicit presentation than you get with your Quad esl57, I can strongly recommend the ML CLSiiz full range stats that I use.
After all, they'll be up for sale next week :D

Tom, you need to try bigger and bigger speakers until the wife doesn't bat an eyelid when you bring in stacked ESLs!

 
G

Guest

Guest
JANDL100 wrote:

An interesting review, indeed - from a listener with substantially overlapping musical tastes to my own.I've not heard the ML Vista, but other ML hybrids I have heard have always had panel/bass disjoint issues. Not so with some other stat hybrids (e.g. my old Electrostatic Research Vista II - the same name is coincidental I am sure!) so it isn't necessarily a fault with the genre. The stat panels on the ERs was much bigger than on your ML Vistas so I am surethey went significantly lower in frequency. Mind you, I had the same issues when demoing large ML hybrids, so ....

If you fancy a rather more open window & explicit presentation than you get with your Quad esl57, I can strongly recommend the ML CLSiiz full range stats that I use.
Very interesting .... I'm sure a full range ML would bea lot of funand I'd love to hear them.

As for Adam's comment on the stacked Quads ... well ...The thought HAD crossed my mind ....

 

JANDL100

Wammer
Wammer Plus
Dec 5, 2006
20,120
7,846
208
Forest of Dean, Glos
AKA
Jerry
HiFi Trade?
  1. No
AmDismal wrote:

JANDL100 wrote:
If you fancy a rather more open window & explicit presentation than you get with your Quad esl57, I can strongly recommend the ML CLSiiz full range stats that I use.
After all, they'll be up for sale next week :D
Werlll .... it's well over 4 months now, and I'm still not pining (too much ;-) ) for a change of speaker!

 

alphatoner

Wammer
Wammer
Mar 17, 2007
2,848
272
128
Tring, Herts
AKA
Ian
HiFi Trade?
  1. No
JANDL100 wrote:

If you fancy a rather more open window & explicit presentation than you get with your Quad esl57, I can strongly recommend the ML CLSiiz full range stats that I use.
Jerry, have you tried this tweek for your ML's look interesting.

 

JANDL100

Wammer
Wammer Plus
Dec 5, 2006
20,120
7,846
208
Forest of Dean, Glos
AKA
Jerry
HiFi Trade?
  1. No
Buggering around with a soldering iron in my CLSs? :shock:You are clearly unaware ofthe level of my DIY incompetence. ;-) Interesting, though.

Must admit that I suspect 'half' of the improvements cited are really only with reference to the larger listening rooms generally available in the USA. In my 12x20 foot room my CLSs are never strained or run out of puff. Clearer and more neutral are also improvements mentioned. Bloody hell, that hardly seems possible, tbh. But I guess the new CLX (at £25k) is said to be both of those things.

 

Forum statistics

Threads
113,444
Messages
2,451,263
Members
70,783
Latest member
reg66

Latest Articles