Guess what? I think 0,6 is best and most musical I've tried so far. Why this should be I've no idea. This torque is not much more than finger tight – so not too tight – but tight enough apparently.
I’m sure you’re right. Logically, tight enough is all that’s needed. Or am I missing something?
But if you’re a manufacturer I can see that it might make sense to assemble a bit tighter as screws rarely get tighter by themselves. (Irony mode off.
)
Or Linn could do like Spendor and issue correct torque values for each speaker...But if you’re a manufacturer I can see that it might make sense to assemble a bit tighter as screws rarely get tighter by themselves. (Irony mode off.
Oh, do they? That’s interesting. I wonder if it’s how they make them - on which case it’ll be what’s needed, plus a bit extra if my theory holds good. Do you reckon Spendor do it for engineering reasons, or that they listen to multiple settings first?
I was going to ask ATC when I tightened my SCM40s, but I used Allen keys and just did it finger tight. I’ve not had the courage to try on my Guarneri as they look too pretty, and delicate!
Managed it – torqued to 1,1 nm (all slightly tightened).
Yes, you're missing that it has nothing to do with what seems "logical"!
Similar threads
