But they’re not are they? In fact if you wish to connect a CD player or a turntable they’ll require more ‘wires’ than wired speakers. A misnomer if ever there was one.
99.9% of the “wireless speakers” target consumer streams music...But they’re not are they? In fact if you wish to connect a CD player or a turntable they’ll require more ‘wires’ than wired speakers. A misnomer if ever there was one.
Indeed but I think the term wireless speakers for the non Hi-Fi person probably conjures up the image of speakers free from the encumbrance and mess of wires which allows them to be placed anywhere.I’ve got a pair of KEF LS50W speakers and as far as I know the term ‘wireless’ is about them being connected to my home network via WiFi, not whether or not they have physical cables connected to them. The main thing I don’t need is an equipment rack, which is a big improvement if you want a ‘lifestyle’ type of HiFi installation.
Maybe a better term would be ‘WiFi Speakers’ then, like we refer to ‘Bluetooth Speakers’, some of which are mains powered with cables connected to their ‘aux’ inputs.Indeed but I think the term wireless speakers for the non Hi-Fi person probably conjures up the image of speakers free from the encumbrance and mess of wires which allows them to be placed anywhere.
That’s a excellent point! After all a wireless router has a mains connection and a cable carrying the signal from our ISP.Maybe a better term would be ‘WiFi Speakers’ then, like we refer to ‘Bluetooth Speakers’, some of which are mains powered with cables connected to their ‘aux’ inputs.