The point I was trying to make is that nobody should have their audiophile nervosa triggered just because there's a buzz around these various aftermarket LPSUs on Hi-Fi forums. Of course many cheap SMPS can be improved upon, but many are carefully designed and implemented, even chosen over LPSU for their performance.
The way Hi-fi manufacturers latch on to these trends in quite admirable.
2018: Someone on a Hi-fi forum claims a particular model of network switch has improved their sound quality
2021: Innuos release £2500 network switch.
The audiophile butterfly effect.
Sorry, I responded between work calls and didn't mean to be quite so direct.
You make a good point, and of course marketing and A.Nervosa are great bedfellows.
But your mention of network switches reinforces my point, I'm afraid. IMHO you actually weaken it by wrapping in something which is clearly close to Pure Foo (I'm being gentle and polite for the believers): I suspect that a massive (100% perhaps!) influencing factor in the interest in "audiophile" network switches is marketing-led. As is much, though not all, of the cable market. But LPSU's are genuinely different (sweeping generalisation, caveats apply, etc); I've heard power supplies make a clearly audible difference to the Node and to one of the cheaper Chord DACs, that's it. But that is no marketing mirage. In fact, most of the aftermarket LPSU's are probably manufactured by one-man-band outfits, sold by word of mouth, with precious little spent on clever branding and marketing.
Have you heard well-made LPSU vs well-made SMPS on anything? If so, what? I would urge those who fight the corner of SMPS in general to do so. No-one is promising a revelation here, but others have been surprised by what should, in theory, not make anything like the difference it does. I'm talking digital front-ends here, not amps, so may well be off-topic.