Your own ears should be enough. I have heard several CD players through my system (borrowed and owned) and I have to say they ALL sound different to one another. I currently have 3 linked into my system, a Cambridge Azur 640C and Marantz CD6002, both similarly priced, and a Pioneer PDR-609 recorder (S/H purchase) that was originally a bit cheaper. The Marantz has the best all round sound, cleaner, with a sense of space and depth, and more evenly balanced. The Cambridge has a brighter, slightly less clean sound but with a very open airy feel to it (a bit like a budget MC), and the Pioneer, whilst it makes excellent recordings, has a less satisfactory playback sound. Less sense of space and a slightly stodgy bottom end. A sound that is strangely more acceptable than it sounds on paper as it is quite well balanced. I am curious to try an upmarket machine, but cannot afford one - though the Cambridge might get me part of the way there if I got a decent S/H price for it. In the early days of CD and DVD I heard other players that were variously harsh or dull sounding. These are products that certainly justify auditioning and comparing.I would love it if a dealler could show, in a properly conducted blind level matched test, why their CD player was better than a Tesco CD player. That dealers never try this suggests that they can't.S.
:cafe:I would love it if a dealler could show, in a properly conducted blind level matched test, why their CD player was better than a Tesco CD player. That dealers never try this suggests that they can't.S.
It suggests nothing of the sort. They wouldn't do it because it would be a complete waste of their time and money.I would love it if a dealler could show, in a properly conducted blind level matched test, why their CD player was better than a Tesco CD player. That dealers never try this suggests that they can't.S.
Did I really say that? Perhaps I meant 'not as practical'."Less digital" Rick??!! Better rinse your mouth. There's no such sound when we are all talking about flat response and minimal distortion! What else is here to give you a " digital" sound PS. Last time we met you and i both moaned about how turntable wasn't as good as cd...I see you've now gone all analogue crazy
Agreed.Thing is, I find long term listening (where you really get to know components) far more illuminating than a quick A/B/whatever. For me, quick A/B tests only seem to be able to identify gross differences, while the subtler characterisation of a component manifests as a feeling about something over time, usually a growing sense of dissatisfaction with some aspect which can then be contrasted with something else over time.
Agreed.Thing is, I find long term listening (where you really get to know components) far more illuminating than a quick A/B/whatever. For me, quick A/B tests only seem to be able to identify gross differences, while the subtler characterisation of a component manifests as a feeling about something over time, usually a growing sense of dissatisfaction with some aspect which can then be contrasted with something else over time.
I agree more.Agreed.
Indeed my Krell CDP kicks out 6V and causes some pre-amps problems with input overload, so I have put it on variable output rather than fixed. My Micromega T-DAC/T-Drive kicks out 2V.I'm surprised nobody, especially Serge, has mentioned the effect of different output voltages yet. There's a nominal 2V standard for line level kit but I'm sure I've seen CD players kicking out up to 6V, and if you're doing a direct side-by-side comparison without proper (not by ear) level matching the 6V player will win every time. - Someone does the maths for me; how many dB up is even a 1V difference?By the way, I'm not saying all CD players sound the same. I've heard an EMM-Labs CD player on two separate occasions that has had me thinking about a bank loan, but I couldn't sit and swear I heard it under anything like level matched conditions.
Is that BMW agreed or Audi cunt faced agreed? :roll:Agreed.- - - Updated - - -
I agree more.