Does anyone know who composed the Danube Waltz, and is it part of a whole concerto, (is that the right term)? Also, I know various orchestra's will have played it, so is there any good recordings to be had?
The children of Sweet Music are calling me!Johan Strauss composed it.Better wait for Solid to come along
Given that it was written in the early 19th Century with romantic and melodious intent, surely dragging it kicking and screaming into the 21st century is a bit like putting stockings and suspenders on your great grandma?Ya just a hopeless Karajanite. His Danube is pure cotton candy kitsch. The best Danube comes from Carlos Kleiber and the Wieners at the 1992 NeuJahrsKonzert. The man takes it straight into the 21st century. Over and out!:dude::dude::dude:
Ya the reason why everything is SOOOOO WRONG in the classical arena currently. Too many clueless socialites who ONLY want to hear the classics performed in the same manner as their great great forefathers. They don't want any visionary conductor to come along and shake up their preconceived notions. Get an imagination! The greatestpieces in classical music can AND MUST stand up tobeing rendered in a new and unsentimental fashion. Else we consumers are doomed, STUCK in a vicious cycle of endless waffling in <<traditional>> performances.Kingsley wrote:Given that it was written in the early 19th Century with romantic and melodious intent, surely dragging it kicking and screaming into the 21st century is a bit like putting stockings and suspenders on your great grandma?Ya just a hopeless Karajanite. His Danube is pure cotton candy kitsch. The best Danube comes from Carlos Kleiber and the Wieners at the 1992 NeuJahrsKonzert. The man takes it straight into the 21st century. Over and out!:dude::dude::dude:
You see that tiny dot vanishing over the horizon?earl of sodbury wrote:Ya the reason why everything is SOOOOO WRONG in the classical arena currently. Too many clueless socialites who ONLY want to hear the classics performed in the same manner as their great great forefathers. They don't want any visionary conductor to come along and shake up their preconceived notions. Get an imagination! The greatestpieces in classical music can AND MUST stand up tobeing rendered in a new and unsentimental fashion. Else we consumers are doomed, STUCK in a vicious cycle of endless waffling in <<traditional>> performances.Kingsley wrote:Given that it was written in the early 19th Century with romantic and melodious intent, surely dragging it kicking and screaming into the 21st century is a bit like putting stockings and suspenders on your great grandma?Ya just a hopeless Karajanite. His Danube is pure cotton candy kitsch. The best Danube comes from Carlos Kleiber and the Wieners at the 1992 NeuJahrsKonzert. The man takes it straight into the 21st century. Over and out!:dude::dude::dude:
[Mister T] Not a waltz, fool, a principle; I don't even like the Blue Danube! [/Mister T]I can't believe people are fighting over... ... ...a waltz.Get a life and listen to Richard Strauss's Rosenkavalier waltzes instead. These have real meat and bones and sentiment on 'em.
solidstateman wrote:[Mister T] Not a waltz, fool, a principle; I don't even like the Blue Danube! [/Mister T]I can't believe people are fighting over... ... ...a waltz.Get a life and listen to Richard Strauss's Rosenkavalier waltzes instead. These have real meat and bones and sentiment on 'em.
eofs
My thoughts exactly.The worst thing is they both said the same thing, just in different ways. :Not Sure:
Not so, in a nutshell - Rentybhoy was arguing for modern reinterpretations of established classics, while I attempted to make a case for performing them as the composer intended (e&oe) while insteadlooking for novelty in new musical works by modern composers.The worst thing is they both said the same thing, just in different ways. :Not Sure:
To clarify, Kings was arguing on the assumption that Strauss's Blue Danube is a modern, ageless piece which can be adapted to a futuristic interpretation/performance. In thiscase, both of youare in agreement: because you also approve of novel approaches to 'new' musical works.hifiwigwam wrote:Not so, in a nutshell - Rentybhoy was arguing for modern reinterpretations of established classics, while I attempted to make a case for performing them as the composer intended (e&oe) while insteadlooking for novelty in new musical works by modern composers.The worst thing is they both said the same thing, just in different ways. :Not Sure:
Though I was arguing for the sheer hell of it TBHDon't give a rat's arse about the Blue Danube... :raoflmfao:
Fair Enough.hifiwigwam wrote:Not so, in a nutshell - Rentybhoy was arguing for modern reinterpretations of established classics, while I attempted to make a case for performing them as the composer intended (e&oe) while insteadlooking for novelty in new musical works by modern composers.The worst thing is they both said the same thing, just in different ways. :Not Sure:
Though I was arguing for the sheer hell of it TBHDon't give a rat's arse about the Blue Danube... :raoflmfao:
earl of sodbury wrote:
hifiwigwam wrote:Not so, in a nutshell - Rentybhoy was arguing for modern reinterpretations of established classics, while I attempted to make a case for performing them as the composer intended (e&oe) while insteadlooking for novelty in new musical works by modern composers.The worst thing is they both said the same thing, just in different ways. :Not Sure:
Though I was arguing for the sheer hell of it TBHDon't give a rat's arse about the Blue Danube... :raoflmfao:
Wha?:shock:You're so easily swayed.Fair Enough.:mmmm:
Well as much as the Earl couldn't give a flids arm about the Blue Danube, I coudn't give a midgets cock about an argument about the Blue Danube. Capiche?hifiwigwam wrote:earl of sodbury wrote:hifiwigwam wrote:Not so, in a nutshell - Rentybhoy was arguing for modern reinterpretations of established classics, while I attempted to make a case for performing them as the composer intended (e&oe) while insteadlooking for novelty in new musical works by modern composers.The worst thing is they both said the same thing, just in different ways. :Not Sure:
Though I was arguing for the sheer hell of it TBHDon't give a rat's arse about the Blue Danube... :raoflmfao:Wha?:shock:You're so easily swayed.Fair Enough.:mmmm:
I'm so disappointed.
Good thing we cleared that-one up.solidstateman wrote:Well as much as the Earl couldn't give a flids arm about the Blue Danube, I coudn't give a midgets cock about an argument about the Blue Danube. Capiche?hifiwigwam wrote:earl of sodbury wrote:hifiwigwam wrote:Not so, in a nutshell - Rentybhoy was arguing for modern reinterpretations of established classics, while I attempted to make a case for performing them as the composer intended (e&oe) while insteadlooking for novelty in new musical works by modern composers.The worst thing is they both said the same thing, just in different ways. :Not Sure:
Though I was arguing for the sheer hell of it TBHDon't give a rat's arse about the Blue Danube... :raoflmfao:Wha?:shock:You're so easily swayed.Fair Enough.:mmmm:
I'm so disappointed.