I think this is this is the one:
Has been posted on here before.
I've seen that shared before but not watched it due to the click-bait title and that I had no idea if the guy talking was worth paying any attention to. Playing the video now I'd honestly have normally given up on it after a minute or two. The commonality between the DACs mentioned is hardly news, which more than anything begs the question why he'd bought so many of them in the first place. On the filters point I think he's missing that these are options built into the DAC chips themselves, so it's not remotely surprising that DACs using the same DAC chip will have the same options.
Just for you I did watch long enough to get to the useless comment I think you were referring to, where he simply says, "and the pre-amp section is still s**t." That's hardly an informative comment and I don't know what he actually means, and honestly I'm not convinced he knows exactly what he means either.
If you think of a hifi pre-amp (in the sense of a system component) it performs the functions of source selection and signal level attenuation/gain (if active). Within a DAC, I think source selection is performed upstream of the DAC chip, if digital-domain volume adjustment is applied this will generally be on the DAC chip itself, and then there is an analogue output section between the DAC pin-out and the output sockets on the back of the DAC (usually in part to convert from a current signal to a voltage signal I believe). Which part of this may be 'the pre-amp section' I'm really not sure.
If R2R are on the way out, what is replacing them?
What triggered this comment? I've been more aware of R2R DACs in the last five years than I was in the preceding fifteen. Maybe it's just been where I've been getting info. from I suppose but I don't go out of my way to look into R2R DACs as they generally seem to have too high latency to be of use to me personally.